Debunking myths on genetics and DNA

Musings on writing, genetics and photography. Sign up for my newsletter to get exclusive stories, ARCs, and free desktop wallpapers from my photography portfolio.


Friday, December 2, 2011

Another genetic puzzle: why is mitochondrial DNA only inherited from the mother's side?


Remember when I told you that bacteria have circular DNA? Well, we have it too, only not in the nucleus where the rest of our DNA sits. It's a rather interesting story, one that biologist Lynn Margulis proved in 1967 [1]: our cells contain organelles called mitochondria, which originally were separate organisms (prokaryotes), and at some point entered a symbiotic relationship with eukaryotic cells through endosymbiosis. As a result, they contain their own, circular DNA called mitochondrial DNA or, in short, mtDNA.


Circularity is not the only fascinating thing about mtDNA. It contains 37 genes, and, because it's not found in the nucleus, non-nucleated cells like precortical cells (found in hair shafts) can't be used for DNA analysis, but can indeed be used to extract mtDNA. However, whereas nuclear DNA is unique to each individual, mtDNA is not. That's because it's inherited exclusively through the maternal lineage. As you know, paternal and maternal chromosomes undergo recombination and then fuse together to make the unique DNA of a new individual. However, mtDNA does not undergo recombination and the only variation happening is due to random mutations when the cell splits. These are quite rare and in fact, it's not unusual to share identical mtDNA with our siblings, and/or to inherit it unchanged from our mothers.

Maternal mtDNA inheritance occurs in most eukaryotic species, indicating that, from an evolutionary point of view, it's an old and conserved mechanism. One might argue that paternal gametes (sperm) are much smaller than maternal gametes (eggs) and therefore contribute a limited amount of mitochondria, which then get lost. In fact, the general belief was that, at least in some species, paternal mitochondria was excluded due to the fact that only the head of the spermatozoon enters the oocyte's cytoplasm. Well, that doesn't quite explain the whole story, and the mechanism that allows the clearance of paternal mitochondria during early embryonegesis was not understood until recently.

Two studies published in the November 25 issue of Science [2, 3] used a Caenorhabditis elegans model to show that the degradation of paternal mitochondria is achieved through involvement of autophagosomes, double membrane vesicles that recruit the organelles, engulf them, and then destroy them. Rawi et al. also proved that autophagy is triggered in the mouse too, within minutes after fertilization, whereas, in the absence of autophagosomes (which they induced artificially in some animals), the paternal mitochondria persist in the embryos.

This is a great step forward, but many questions remain unanswered, as Levine and Elazar note in the accompanying perspective:
"The findings of Sato and Sato and Al Rawi et al. help to explain how paternal mitochondria and mtDNA are destroyed, but why they are destroyed remains a mystery. Is heteroplasmy, the occurrence of more than one mtDNA genotype, dangerous for the developing embryo? Or is the degradation of paternal mitochondria merely a primitive defense in which the fertilized oocyte views the paternal mitochondria as a potentially dangerous intruder that must be destroyed?"

[1] Sagan, L. (Margulis, L.) (1967). On the origin of mitosing cells Journal of Theoretical Biology, 14 (3) DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(67)90079-3

[2] Sato, M., & Sato, K. (2011). Degradation of Paternal Mitochondria by Fertilization-Triggered Autophagy in C. elegans Embryos Science, 334 (6059), 1141-1144 DOI: 10.1126/science.1210333

[3] Al Rawi, S., Louvet-Vallee, S., Djeddi, A., Sachse, M., Culetto, E., Hajjar, C., Boyd, L., Legouis, R., & Galy, V. (2011). Postfertilization Autophagy of Sperm Organelles Prevents Paternal Mitochondrial DNA Transmission Science, 334 (6059), 1144-1147 DOI: 10.1126/science.1211878

ResearchBlogging.org

6 comments:

  1. wow, I was struck by reading this that not only are we chimerical (hybridized with a whole other domain of life, no less), we are both haploid and diploid.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I guess you could put it that way. Indeed, from an evolutionary perspective, mitochondria are wonderful things.

    Thanks for reading!

    ReplyDelete
  3. On the off chance you read comments on old posts a couple hypotheses for only maternal mt inheritance: 1) after hundreds of replilcation cycles, sperm mitochondria are much more likely to damaged or defective. 2) Swimming sperm mt are under selection pressure to be fast, and if paternal mt were inherited mt would be less adaptable to other selective pressures. Neither of these are my hyp, btw.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I always read (and very much appreciate!) comments, that's why I have it set up that they end up right in my inbox! :-)

      That's very interesting, thank you!

      Delete
  4. You might be interested in C. Barr et al (2005) Inheritance and recombination of mitochondrial genomes in plants, fungi and animals - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01492.x/full - which discusses this phenomena across a range of organisms. Fascinatingly it seems that it's actually evolved multiple times and there's even some spectacularly weird variants: male bivalves have maternal mtDNA in their somatic tissue but paternal mtDNA in their gonads.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the reference, Jack, I just downloaded it and I'll read it tonight!

      Delete

Comments are moderated. Comments with spam links will be deleted and never published. So, if your intention is to leave a comment just to post a bogus link, please spare your time and mine. To all others: thank you for leaving a comment, I will respond as soon as possible.